Good point Jerry84.
Thanks for your perspective FoxyCleopatra.
I’ve been quibbling this topic with the people of springleap for years. And everytime someone brings up something new that I had never thought of before. I’m self taught (If you can call it that) so I don’t know “design rules” I don’t believe people should be allowed to patent a colour and I don’t see how a series of pixels can belong to someone, as if it were an aesthetic barcode. But all this being said, it looks like I’ve crossed the line, (several times) bordering on crosshatching. Maybe Springleap needs to monitor what I submit more closely. Ban the autotrace, Ban the vuvuzela, Ban the DaRKo.
Mike Masnick of Techdirt writes,” …While people sit back and claim that remixing is “stealing” or “lazy” or “not art” at all, that’s totally missing the point. Art is not about just the creator. Without the shared experience, it’s a lot less valuable – and what we’ve done with copyright laws is make it that much more difficult to share that experience through our own eyes and our own cultural views. And if you don’t see the shame in that, then you’re missing a lot.”
“This clip from the documentary “Copyright Criminals” illustrates the point beautifully.”:http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2010/02/copyright-law-art-as-a-shared-experience.html
Heres the link to the original post just incase you were wanting to nail me for Plagiarism too.
Hey you guys suck, that wasn’t the deal.
Maybe next time make a better brief, because clearly NO ONE understood what you were getting at, so you can’t blame the people who submit the designs.
Epic Colab of Seemingly Stock Vector Quality Elements. I give…. 3
Like you illustration style, its like Apple meets Ikea
Nice, I dig.
Generation II Futurama Style?
Nice Jack Black Rip, Cool.
Skechers?
stock vector rose?
Good point Jerry84.
Thanks for your perspective FoxyCleopatra.
I’ve been quibbling this topic with the people of springleap for years. And everytime someone brings up something new that I had never thought of before. I’m self taught (If you can call it that) so I don’t know “design rules” I don’t believe people should be allowed to patent a colour and I don’t see how a series of pixels can belong to someone, as if it were an aesthetic barcode. But all this being said, it looks like I’ve crossed the line, (several times) bordering on crosshatching. Maybe Springleap needs to monitor what I submit more closely. Ban the autotrace, Ban the vuvuzela, Ban the DaRKo.
Copyright Law vs. Art As A Shared Experience
Mike Masnick of Techdirt writes,” …While people sit back and claim that remixing is “stealing” or “lazy” or “not art” at all, that’s totally missing the point. Art is not about just the creator. Without the shared experience, it’s a lot less valuable – and what we’ve done with copyright laws is make it that much more difficult to share that experience through our own eyes and our own cultural views. And if you don’t see the shame in that, then you’re missing a lot.”
“This clip from the documentary “Copyright Criminals” illustrates the point beautifully.”:http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2010/02/copyright-law-art-as-a-shared-experience.html
Heres the link to the original post just incase you were wanting to nail me for Plagiarism too.
Hey you guys suck, that wasn’t the deal.
Maybe next time make a better brief, because clearly NO ONE understood what you were getting at, so you can’t blame the people who submit the designs.
would have preferred to have seen springleap in the box where “talent” is
Twilight meets Pacman
love the very vague link to springleap, in the sense that springleap is in Africa, and this is a design of the continent in which they live.
wow, if I had done this people would be harassing me still.
clever concept.
I dig the tats you always put on your shirt template.