Palo – Hi there from a mere mortal, who astoundingly, is exceedingly proud of being one. So, O great and wise Palo, lord of all designs, what might I say to your unnecessarily rude post? Firstly, I have an issue with how pretentious your attitude is. When other people have failed at winning the coveted 1st prize, they do not insult the Springleap community, they take the advice given to them and apply it to their next design.

Now onto what I seem ought to have criticised about your design the first time, if only to deflate your head. Without the niceties I usually try to soften my posts:

Your text is inane to anyone but yourself.
Black with white text would likely have made the idea pop for better than the bland choice of white with black.
The “bang” has nothing of the expression you’re aiming for, and it needs far more work, simply, it looks dull. Personally, I would never buy this shirt.
Also, how on this sweet and beautiful earth does your explanation relate to the design? Its completely nonsensical in the context.
Perhaps my status as a ‘mere mortal’ prevents me from grasping whatever it is you seem to have portrayed most eloquently in your own mind

Palo, my advice, don’t treat others as though they are below you, don’t forgo the joys of mindless entertainment, don’t pretend that just because you are intelligent in one aspect, you are not below the intelligence of another person in another aspect.

Palo – Im sorry mate, but I really don’t get what your going for with this design. And if it takes an accompanying explanation, perhaps it has not been properly executed? As the saying goes, ‘a picture says a thousand words’, so if you could perhaps have a design incorporating your ideas, it would work out far better =] Sorry if I bum you out man

so, if u understand that a desk u work from for example; on an atomic level; though it appears hard and u experience it as hard is not actually made up of anything that we can constitute as hard…like soap bubbles; but your mind translates it as being hard, firm, substantial, etc…

now to try and understand multi-D first try to grasp 4-D…
u can agree that we live in accordance to 3D perception; we translate and relate to our world in 3D…?
if so, lets now relate to 4D as TIME, for now…time in linear expression we understand thru our 3D mind as being made up of past, present and future. However, should u take that linear expression and loop it so as to extend its dimensions what u get is a time line that runs thru itself, so that what u get is the past the present and the future are constantly running thru and past themselves in accordance to the fact that the linear is now a loop because we are shifting our perception away from the linear 3D to a broader 4D perception…????????????????
something like that…if u can sort of get it, that is all u need for now, just get the big picture and don’t worry about the semantics, for now…